Increasing thermal efficiency in internal combustion engines through automated control of operational processes

Viktor Duhanets, Vitaliy Pukas, Mykola Volynkin
Abstract

The study aimed to analyse a closed-loop control strategy that adjusts the ignition timing and fuel injection to increase work output in the cylinder whilst ensuring knock safety and reducing cycle instability. The methodology was based on methods of energy (thermal) balance analysis, classification and analytical systematisation, structural-functional modelling, comparative analysis and analytical generalisation. It has been established that the thermal efficiency of an internal combustion engine (ICE) is the proportion of the fuel energy converted into useful work. The difference between theoretical and actual efficiency indicates the amount of energy lost due to mechanical and auxiliary processes. The energy balance reflects the distribution of fuel energy between useful work at the shaft, heat dissipation to the cooling system, losses with exhaust gases, and other types of losses, allowing the dominant directions of its utilisation to be identified. Increasing the efficiency is limited by rising pressures, temperatures and thermal loads; therefore, optimal heat release phasing is key, which must be maintained without detonation or excessive peaks. The study determined that injection and ignition parameters determine the combustion phasing and power output; and since injection alters ignition conditions, the ignition timing must be coordinated with the fuel strategy (particularly in a closed-loop system). Parameter optimisation is constrained by detonation, thermomechanical, emission and operational factors, which define the permissible range of settings. The study noted that automated control improves efficiency by optimising mixture formation and the combustion phase, and by reducing mechanical and auxiliary losses through coordinated control of the subsystems. The reduction in mechanical and auxiliary losses is achieved through a combination of tribological solutions and control of the units to avoid excessive energy consumption. The use of energy balance as a criterion and coordinated closed-loop control of ignition, fuel supply and auxiliary systems via the engine control unit (ECU) makes it possible to reduce dominant losses and improve the efficiency of the internal combustion engine within the limits of detonation and thermal load constraints. The practical significance lies in the ability of engineers to apply the results when calibrating the ECU during bench tests and engine tuning on the vehicle

Keywords

detonation; ignition; injection; restriction; combustion phasing

Suggested citation
Duhanets, V., Pukas, V., & Volynkin, M. (2026). Increasing thermal efficiency in internal combustion engines through automated control of operational processes. Machinery & Energetics, 17(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.31548/machinery/1.2026.43
References
  1. Ahmed, O.Y., Middleton, R.J., Tran, V., Weng, A., Stefanopoulou, A.G., Kim, K.S., & Kweon, C.B. (2022). Model predictive control of combustion phasing in compression ignition engines by coordinating fuel injection timing and ignition assist. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(24), 90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.267.
  2. Aliramezani, M., Koch, C.R., & Shahbakhti, M. (2021). Modeling, diagnostics, optimization, and control of internal combustion engines via modern machine learning techniques: A review and future directions. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 88, article number 100967. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100967.
  3. Arsie, I., Frasci, E., Irimescu, A., & Merola, S.S. (2024). Spark timing optimization through co-simulation analysis in a spark ignition engine. Energies, 17(15), article number 3695. doi: 10.3390/en17153695.
  4. Björnsson, O., & Tunestal, P. (2024). Evaluation of closed-loop combustion phase optimization for varying fuel compensation and cylinder balancing in a HD SI-ICE. SAE Technical Paperdoi: 10.4271/2024-01-2837.
  5. Chen, Z., Ju, P., Wang, Z., Shi, L., & Deng, K. (2025). Research on multi-objective optimization control of diesel engine combustion process based on model predictive control-guided reinforcement learning method. Energy, 325, article number 136173. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.136173.
  6. Esaki, K., Shirakawa, Y., Naito, H., Matsumoto, K., & Ito, K. (2022). Automated machine learning of engine control parameters for various mixed fuels to help achieve carbon neutralityHitachi Review, 71(2), 56-60.
  7. Gangopadhyay, A. (2021). Power cylinder friction reduction through coatings, surface finish and design. Dearborn: Ford Motor Company.
  8. GhafGhanbari, P., Bao, Y., & Mohammadpour Velni, J. (2024). Uncertainty-aware output feedback model predictive combustion control of RCCI engines. Control Engineering Practice, 150, article number 106005. doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.106005.
  9. Güler, M., & Özkan, M. (2022). Energy balance analysis of a DI diesel engine with multiple pilot injections strategy and optimization of brake thermal efficiency. Applied Thermal Engineering, 204, article number 117972. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117972.
  10. Henry de Frahan, M., Wimer, N., Yellapantula, S., & Grout, R. (2022). Deep reinforcement learning for dynamic control of fuel injection timing in multi-pulse compression ignition engines. International Journal of Engine Research, 23(9), 1503-1521. doi: 10.1177/14680874211019345.
  11. Hu, B., Huang, Y., Zhang, F., & Liang, S. (2024). Online calibration algorithm for fuel injection MAP of unit-pump diesel engine based on mesh adaptive Bayesian optimization. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 58(29), 70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.11.122.
  12. Kaltakkıran, G., Ceviz, M.A., & Bakirci, K. (2022). Instantaneous energy balance and performance analysis during warm up period of a spark ignition engine under several thermal energy management strategies. Energy Conversion and Management, 269, article number 116102. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116102.
  13. Kou, Y., Gao, Y., You, Y., & Wang, Y. (2022). Numerical investigation for optimization of spark-ignition internal combustion engine knock by Taguchi-Grey method. Science Progress, 105(4). doi: 10.1177/00368504221129280.
  14. Liu, Z., Cheng, L., & Zhai, X. (2022). Experimental study on the oil pump driving energy consumption and lubrication safety in a PFI engine under NEDC and WLTC. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 36, 457-465. doi: 10.1007/s12206-021-1243-3.
  15. Lou, D., Rao, X., Zhang, Y., Fang, L., Tan, P., & Hu, Z. (2024). Investigation of impacts of hydrogen injection and spark strategy on knock in hydrogen engine. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 82, 1252-1262. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.08.052.
  16. Menaca, R., Silva, M., Uddeen, K., Almatrafi, F., Tang, Q., Turner, J.W., & Im, H.G. (2025). Optical multi-spark ammonia combustion engine: Numerical analysis and validation. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, 11, article number 1478081. doi: 10.3389/fmech.2025.1478081.
  17. Mittal, V. (2024). A review of recent advancements in knock detection in spark ignition engines. Signals, 5(1), 165-180. doi: 10.3390/signals5010009.
  18. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2021). Assessment of Technologies for Improving Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy – 2025-2035. Washington: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26092.
  19. Park, J., Shin, S., Oh, S., Lee, S., Shin, W., & Min, K. (2023). Knock onset determination with 1D CNN using random search hyperparameter optimization and data augmentation in SI engine. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 24, 1395-1410. doi: 10.1007/s12239-023-0113-7.
  20. Pereira, B.C., Pereira, B.S., Teixeira, E.L., Laganá, A.A., Cipparrone, F.A., & Santos, M.M. (2023). Design, implementation and testing of a spark-ignition engine management system. Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems, 34, 554-565. doi: 10.1007/s40313-022-00978-z.
  21. Peyton Jones, J.C., Patel, V., & Frey, J. (2025). Knock feedback control strategies: A review. Annual Reviews in Control, 59, article number 100990. doi: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2025.100990.
  22. Popa, D., Stan, C., Marin, N., Savu, N., & Ailincai, D. (2022). Study concerning the thermal energy balance in an internal combustion engine. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 960, article number 012012. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/960/1/012012.
  23. Ryaboshapka, N.Ye., Sukhonos, R.F., & Hrachov, P.V. (2023). Influence of ignition advance angle on the working processes of gasoline internal combustion engines operating on fuel with ethanol addition. In Materials of the 14th international scientific and practical conference “Modern energy installations in transport, technologies and equipment for their service” (CEUTTOO-2023) (pp. 163-164). Kherson: Kherson State Maritime Academy.
  24. Slynko, H.I., Yevsieieva, N.O., Kurylov, M.S., Sukhonos, R.F., & Slynko, V.V. (2022). Improving the characteristics of the MeMZ-317 engine with an LPG system by installing an ignition timing advance variatorInnovative Materials and Technologies in Metallurgy and Mechanical Engineering, 1, 78-80. doi: 10.15588/1607-6885-2022-1-13.
  25. Song, J., & Song, H.H. (2022). Spark-ignition engine speed profile optimization for maximizing the net indicated efficiency and quantitative analysis of the optimal speed profile. Applied Energy, 307, article number 118162. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118162.
  26. Tang, J., Pal, A., Dai, W., Archer, C., Yi, J., & Zhu, G. (2021). Stochastic Bayesian optimization for predicting borderline knock. International Journal of Engine Research, 24(3), 793-807. doi: 10.1177/14680874211065237.
  27. Vlaswinkel, M., Antunes, D., & Willems, F. (2025). Automated and risk-aware engine control calibration using constrained Bayesian optimization. ArXivdoi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.20493.
  28. Wang, J., Tian, H., Zhang, R., Shen, B., Su, Y., Yu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Experimental investigation on the effects of direct injection timing on the combustion, performance, and emission characteristics of methanol/gasoline dual-fuel spark turbocharged ignition (DFSI) engine with different injection pressures under high load. Energies, 16(24), article number 7921. doi: 10.3390/en16247921.
  29. Watanabe, K., Uchida, N., Yokogawa, K., & Kawaharazuka, F. (2021). What are the barriers against brake thermal efficiency beyond 55% for HD diesel engines? SAE Technical Paperdoi: 10.4271/2021-24-0039.
  30. Yu, X., Zhu, L., Wang, Y., Filev, D., & Yao, X. (2022). Internal combustion engine calibration using optimization algorithms. Applied Energy, 305, article number 117894. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117894.
  31. Zhu, Q., Prucka, R., Wang, S., & Prucka, M. (2021). Online spark timing optimization with complex high-fidelity combustion phasing, knock, and coefficient of variation of IMEP models. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 143(6), article number 061007. doi: 10.1115/1.4049733.