Aggregation of a mobile energy vehicle of the “Autotractor” with a technological module

Valerii Adamchuk, Serhiy Pohorilyy, Viktor Prysyazhnyy, Vadym Yaremenko, Valerii Mirnyi
Abstract

The relevance of the research was determined by necessity to increase the efficiency of machine and tractor units (MTUs) in both traction-powered and transport-technological operations, while ensuring operational safety. The objective of the research was to experimentally determine the effect of the mass of the technological module (TM) on the axle loads of a mobile energy vehicle (MEV) of the “Autotractor” during aggregation with a rear-mounted three-point hitch. The research addressed the issue of stability and load distribution in MTUs, particularly those with MEVs of the “Autotractor” based on high-mobility truck platforms. The MEV-115 “Autotractor”, developed at the Institute of Mechanics and Automation of Agro-Industrial Production of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, was introduced. This vehicle featured several innovative design solutions, including a centralised tyre pressure control system, a hydraulic system, a frame-based TM mounting system, and a specially designed rear three-point hitch. The hitch structure enabled aggregation with TMs weighing up to 2 tonnes. Its compact design allowed for hassle-free mounting of the TM onto the vehicle frame without disassembling the hitch. Experimental research using strain gauge scales was carried out to verify theoretical calculations on the distribution of axle loads in the MEV depending on the weight and centre of mass of the TM. Critical TM parameters were established for safe operation: the distance from the TM’s centre of mass to the rear axle (0-4 m) and the TM weight (6.39-18.7 kN). TM configurations ensuring balanced axle loads were also defined, eliminating parasitic power circulation between the axles of the MEV-115 “Autotractor”. The minimum front axle load necessary to maintain steerability during transport operations was determined to be at least 20% of the total MTU weight. The results confirmed the validity of the theoretical models and demonstrated the effectiveness of the approach. The findings may be applied to enhance MEV design and optimise their use in agricultural production

Keywords

experimental research methods, measuring equipment, sensor calibration, tractor, mobile energy vehicle (MEV)

Suggested citation
Adamchuk, V., Pohorilyy, S., Prysyazhnyy, V., Yaremenko, V., & Mirnyi, V. (2025). Aggregation of a mobile energy vehicle of the “Autotractor” with a technological module. Machinery & Energetics, 16(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.31548/machinery/2.2025.99
References
  1. Ahmadi, I. (2011). Dynamics of tractor lateral overturn on slopes under the influence of position disturbances (model development). Journal of Terramechanics, 48(5), 339-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2011.07.001.
  2. Bietresato, M., & Mazzetto, F. (2020). Stability tests of agricultural and operating machines by means of an installation composed by a rotating platform (the “turntable”) with four weighting quadrants. Applied Sciences, 10(11), article number 3786. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10113786.
  3. Bulgakov, V., Aboltins, A., Adamchuk, V., Kuvachov, V., & Dovzhenko, O. (2024). Investigation of wide span vehicle technological part movement stability. Engineering for Rural Development, 23, 522-530. https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev.2024.23.TF098.
  4. Bulgakov, V., Ivanovs, S., Viktor, M., & Kuvachov, V. (2021). Simulation of elastic-dissipative connection of multi-axle block-modular agricultural tractor modules. In Proceedings of the 20th international scientific conference engineering for rural development (pp. 628-634). Jelgava, Latvia. https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev.2021.20.TF135.
  5. Carabin, G., Becce, L., & Mazzetto, F. (2023). Development and experimental evaluation of a tractor roll-over stability model. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 337, 429-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30329-6_44.
  6. DSTU 2189-93. (1994). System of labor safety standards. Agricultural mounted and trailed machines. General safety requirements. With change No. 1 and amendment. (1994). Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=89899.
  7. Franceschetti, B., Lenain, R., & Rondelli, V. (2014). Comparison between a rollover tractor dynamic model and actual lateral tests. Biosystems Engineering, 127, 79-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.08.010.
  8. Franceschetti, B., Rondelli, V., & Capacci, E. (2021). Lateral stability performance of articulated narrow-track tractors. Agronomy, 11(12), article number 2512. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122512.
  9. Golub, G., Chuba, V., Achkevych, V., Krushelnytskyi, V., & Tsyvenkova, N. (2023). Modeling of the running system pressure on the soil depending on the structural parameters of the tractors. Technologies and Technical Equipment for Agriculture and Food Industry, 69(1), 369-378. https://doi.org/10.35633/inmateh-69-34.
  10. Keller, A., et al. (2023). Stronger fertilization effects on aboveground versusbelowground plant properties across nine U.S. grasslands. Ecology, 103(2), article number e3891. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3891.
  11. Loveikin, V., Romasevych, Yu., & Zarivny, O. (2024). Development of a mathematical model of stabilisation of device for small-sized cargo transportation. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 20(4), 57-71. doi: 10.31548/dopovidi/3.2024.57.
  12. Pessina, D., Facchinetti, D., Galli, L. E., Bisaglia, C., & Cutini, M. (2022). Survey on the lateral stability of wheeled narrow-track tractors. In M. Biocca, E. Cavallo, M. Cecchini, S. Failla & E. Romano (Eds.), Safety, health and welfare in agriculture and agro-food systems. SHWA 2020. Lecture notes in civil engineering (Vol. 252, pp. 457-467). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98092-4_47.
  13. Pogorilyy, S. P., Prysyazhnyi, V. G., & Mirnyi, V. Y. (2023). Justification of the parameters of technological modules for mobile energy vehicles MEV-115 “Autotractor”. Mechanics and Automatics of Agroindustrial Production, 1(115), 135-142. https://doi.org/10.37204/2786-7765-2023-1-14.
  14. Pogorilyy, S.P., Prysyazhnyi, V.G., Tretyak, V.M., Panasyuk, V.I., Mirnyi, V.Y., & Barabash, R.I. (2022). Perspectives of using mobile energy vehicle of traction class 1.4; 2 in agricultural production. Mechanization and Electrification of Agriculture, 15(114), 108-114. https://doi.org/10.37204/0131-2189-2022-15-13.
  15. Previati, G., Gobbi, M., & Mastinu, G. (2014). Mathematical models for farm tractor rollover predictionInternational Journal of Vehicle Design, 64, 280-303.
  16. Rondelli, V., Martelli, R., Casazza, C., & Guarnieri, A. (2013). Methodological approach to assess tractor stability in normal operation in field using a commercial warning device. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 44, 659-662. https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2013.374.
  17. Sangenis, E., Jao, C.-Sh., Shkel, A.M. (2025). Effect of adding time correlation to SVM-based motion classification in pedestrian navigationIEEE Journal of Indoor and Seamless Positioning and Navigation, 3, 32-42.
  18. Silleli, H., Dayıogˇlu, M.A., Gültekin, A., Saranlı, G., Yıldız, M.A., Akay, E., & Ekmekçi, K. (2008). Anchor mechanism to increase the operator clearance zone on narrow-track wheeled agricultural tractors: Prototype and first tests. Biosystems Engineering, 99(2), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.10.014.
  19. Vantsevich, V., Paldan, J., & Farley, B. (2016). mobility optimization and control of a 4x4 HE-vehicle in curvilinear motion on stochastic terrain. In ASME 2016 international design engineering technical conferences (article number V003T01A005). Charlotte, USA. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2016-59207.
  20. Viktorova, L.V., & Tverezovskaya, N.T. (2017). Foundations of scientific research. Kyiv: National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine.
  21. Yang, H., Chen, Q., Zhang, W., Wei, H., & Lu, J. (2020). Analysis of stability and dynamic model simulation of mountain tractor rollover. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 512(1), article number 012151. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/512/1/012151.